At a basic level, I can. They're pugs. I'm wary of
pugs out of the gate. It saves me some time.
But it's more than that. You know how there are some people who just aren't
very pleasant people but it's really no big deal? And then, there are those few
people who are equally unpleasant but you sense that there's something even
more disturbing below the surface. It's that kind of thing.
>>>At a basic level, I can. They're pugs<<<
yes, as in short for repugnantkins. or, *shudder*...republicans.
since NewSpeak was adopted as the official language for the US..
oh, kinda sorta right around the time Ronald RayGun was running
for his second term in 1984..republican or any other word can
mean pretty much whatever the sayer wants it to mean at the
time, or more accurately and more incidiously, whatever the utterer
of whatever word wants the 'listeners' to think it means.
repugnantkin boiled down to its essence in the modern vernacular
means reagan, bush, clinton, who is also a member of the secret
handshake good old boy society along with Kerry in spite of calling
themselves dems for the purpose of perpetuating the myth of 2
parties and seperation of powers....then, Bush again for another
8 years etc..etc..
that's my own ignorant simplifiied impression of the load of cods
wallop we've been swallowing for 100 years or more.
>>>And then, there are those few people who are equally unpleasant but
you sense that there's something even more disturbing below the surface<<<
not all that far below the surface. you are referring to McCain/Palin.
you don't sound confused or in need of further pondering to me.
I'd say you pretty much nailed it. the repugnantkin agenda, a
most foul and unsavory state of affairs. I don't see a dimes worth
of difference in the alleged dems, ceptin' they act nicer, cuter,
etc...
Governer Palin lends a frightening credibilty to McCain, whom by the
way is certainly not the complete idiot we'd like to believe he is and
refer to him as. no way. but he's always been a loose cannon and
never a charismatic eloquent speaker. Palin was a great choice,
for McCain. and the repugnantkin agenda. I'm not so thrilled
about it my own self.
nor am I enamoured with Joe Biden. I can't stand the guy. the only
reason to vote for Obama IN MY opinion is ..he aint McCain and he
aint a repugnantkin.
for all the good it will do us, I hope he takes the election. it would
at least be a last grasp shot in the dark, "how could it POSSIBLY
be worse" kind of a vote and that is precisely why I will cast said
vote, for Lord Obama Most Merciful, as the Big FAT PumpkinHead
(Rush Limburgher) refers to him
you are uneasy about McCain and Palin because they are swine and
they make your skin crawl. no need to sugar coat it. not yet.
well, I'm PRETTY sure I can still say McCain is a twerp. it's not
against the law yet, is it? damn, I hope not.
