Three-parent babies: Commons in historic vote despite opposition from church leaders

Discussion in 'Soap Box' started by Xaos, Feb 6, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Xaos

    Xaos Well-Known Member

  2. Cicada 3301

    Cicada 3301 Staff Member Safety & Support SF Supporter

    Re: Three-parent babies: Commons in historic vote despite opposition from church lead

    I think it passed did it not? Can't really find an argument against it, from what i heard (was very little) it sounded like it would reduce the risk of some issues/diseases and i forget the rest lol. But anyway i think the name is a bit off putting but besides that it seems like a good, healthy alternative for people out there.
     
  3. DrownedFishOnFire

    DrownedFishOnFire Quieta non movere

    Re: Three-parent babies: Commons in historic vote despite opposition from church lead

    Ugh I never liked science helping people have kids. Sorry but if your genes gave you no-go to reproduce naturally, there is a good reason from nature. It's natures way of telling you not to reproduce or in other situations reproduce with the specific deficient partner.

    Having this method is "cheating"
     
  4. Cicada 3301

    Cicada 3301 Staff Member Safety & Support SF Supporter

    Re: Three-parent babies: Commons in historic vote despite opposition from church lead

    Cheating?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.