what or who?

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

corral

#1
i have learnt in my life that its more important who you have near, not what things you have.
i know material things are important anyway, but if you couch choose, what would you choose?
basically, be rich with everything you can wish for but without someone to love?
or be poor (not super poor but not rich and in need of some things always, saving always, cant just buy any food you wish and etc) but be with someone you share love with?
 

White Dove

Well-Known Member
#3
love..

would not know what to do with be rich except sharing what i would have with the poor so if i was rich i would still be poor cause i would give it all away to help others..

but poor and have love would be better
 
H

Heavoncanwait

#5
I would rather be poor and have someone to love then to be rich and have no one to love.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Please Donate to Help Keep SF Running

Total amount
$145.00
Goal
$255.00
Top