Hi all. Not sure if this needs any trigger warnings or anything, but here we go...
-----
I joined the forum a few days ago. I had the thought that it would be a good idea if there was a forum for talking about suicidal thoughts, but in a way that might be hard to explain.
In this hypothetical forum, someone would say something like: "I have X, Y and Z problems, I've tried many things but they tended to make things worse if anything, society looks down on me etc., therefore suicide seems kind of 'rational' even though you're not supposed to do it etc."
Then the person and other forum members could analyze the statements. The idea would be to acknowledge if a particular statement is correct, incorrect or partly correct, leading towards weighing up the pros and cons of the statements as a totality. So kind of a rational, dispassionate analysis of it all. If you're worried that this might sometimes encourage acting on the thoughts, that's not the point, it's about analyzing whether the thoughts make some kind of rational sense. Even if they appear to make sense, you still don't need to act on them. This reminds me now of a technique I read about where you journal in the third person rather than the first person, which helps you look at your issues in a more helpful way. I'm also reminded of another technique, but I'll avoid mentioning it here in case it looks like I'm spamming. Ask me about it if you like.
Anyway, that's not what this forum is really, but here I am!
-----
I joined the forum a few days ago. I had the thought that it would be a good idea if there was a forum for talking about suicidal thoughts, but in a way that might be hard to explain.
In this hypothetical forum, someone would say something like: "I have X, Y and Z problems, I've tried many things but they tended to make things worse if anything, society looks down on me etc., therefore suicide seems kind of 'rational' even though you're not supposed to do it etc."
Then the person and other forum members could analyze the statements. The idea would be to acknowledge if a particular statement is correct, incorrect or partly correct, leading towards weighing up the pros and cons of the statements as a totality. So kind of a rational, dispassionate analysis of it all. If you're worried that this might sometimes encourage acting on the thoughts, that's not the point, it's about analyzing whether the thoughts make some kind of rational sense. Even if they appear to make sense, you still don't need to act on them. This reminds me now of a technique I read about where you journal in the third person rather than the first person, which helps you look at your issues in a more helpful way. I'm also reminded of another technique, but I'll avoid mentioning it here in case it looks like I'm spamming. Ask me about it if you like.
Anyway, that's not what this forum is really, but here I am!
