I wrote about this in my journal thread. I'm guessing it would come in here. I don't really know how to make sense of it.
Why when it comes to people being there I go from one extreme to the other. If a person doesn't respond it means they aren't there and never will be, and when they do reply I don't know how to handle it.
It a person isn't there it means they'll never be there. Though then when they are it goes back. And forth. And leaves me confused. And how am I meant to respond when someone is there when they weren't? They don't deserve it. Even if it's about me. And it's just, confuzzling. I don't know........... And I don't really understand it, for it doesn't really make any sense at all.
When it gets too much, even if theoretically there's nothing happened (like I was journaling about this before) I just cut off somehow. Not sure if this has any connection to the above or not.
Why when it comes to people being there I go from one extreme to the other. If a person doesn't respond it means they aren't there and never will be, and when they do reply I don't know how to handle it.
It a person isn't there it means they'll never be there. Though then when they are it goes back. And forth. And leaves me confused. And how am I meant to respond when someone is there when they weren't? They don't deserve it. Even if it's about me. And it's just, confuzzling. I don't know........... And I don't really understand it, for it doesn't really make any sense at all.
When it gets too much, even if theoretically there's nothing happened (like I was journaling about this before) I just cut off somehow. Not sure if this has any connection to the above or not.